The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine
- Authors
- Patricia MathewsRozsika Parker
- Journal
- Woman s Art Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/1358191 →Countries where authors are citing The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine
This map shows the geographic impact of The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine
This network shows the impact of The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine.
About The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine
This paper, published in 1991, received 272 indexed citations . Written by Patricia Mathews and Rozsika Parker covering the research area of Museology and Urban Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Museology (130 citations), Urban Studies (67 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (55 citations), Sociology and Political Science (53 citations) and History (29 citations). Published in Woman s Art Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1358191.