Learning to Read: The Great Debate

971 indexed citations
published 1969

Countries where authors are citing Learning to Read: The Great Debate

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Learning to Read: The Great Debate. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Learning to Read: The Great Debate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning to Read: The Great Debate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Learning to Read: The Great Debate

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Learning to Read: The Great Debate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Learning to Read: The Great Debate.

About Learning to Read: The Great Debate

This paper, published in 1969, received 971 indexed citations . Written by Joanna P. Williams and Jeanne S. Chall. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (780 citations), Education (540 citations) and Statistics and Probability (202 citations). Published in American Educational Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1161900.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the unanaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant pathBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Developmental Trauma Disorder: Toward a rational diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories.Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overviewBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper The training—injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarterandharder?Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper BASIC PRINCIPLES OF VIRTUAL ELEMENT METHODSBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Cytokine Mechanisms of Central Sensitization: Distinct and Overlapping Role of Interleukin-1β, Interleukin-6, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Regulating Synaptic and Neuronal Activity in the Superficial Spinal CordBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface FormBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in Double-Muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese CattleBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Role of glucose and insulin resistance in development of type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a 25-year follow-up studyBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age
Rankless by CCL
2026