Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies

115 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 115 indexed citations. Written by David Freeman Engstrom, Daniel E. Ho, Catherine M. Sharkey and Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar covering the research area of Law, Safety Research and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (46 citations), Sociology and Political Science (28 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (27 citations). Published in SSRN Electronic Journal.

Countries where authors are citing Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551505.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper How does environmental policy uncertainty influence corporate green investments? Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper A novel deep learning-based approach for malware detection Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Screening and Testing for Hepatitis B Virus Infection: CDC Recommendations — United States, 2023 Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Schiff base metal complexes as a versatile catalyst: A review Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper The Classification, Molecular Structure and Biological Biosynthesis of Flavonoids, and Their Roles in Biotic and Abiotic Stresses Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Polysaccharides, proteins, and their complex as microencapsulation carriers for delivery of probiotics: A review on carrier types and encapsulation techniques Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Crack detection and quantification for concrete structures using UAV and transformer Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Time-frequency ridge estimation: An effective tool for gear and bearing fault diagnosis at time-varying speeds Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Oil well production prediction based on CNN-LSTM model with self-attention mechanism Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Potential to use metaverse for future teaching and learning
Rankless by CCL
2026