Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies
2020115 citationsCatherine M. Sharkey et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine M. Sharkey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine M. Sharkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine M. Sharkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine M. Sharkey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine M. Sharkey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine M. Sharkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine M. Sharkey. The network helps show where Catherine M. Sharkey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine M. Sharkey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine M. Sharkey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine M. Sharkey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine M. Sharkey. Catherine M. Sharkey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2021). VALUING BLACK AND FEMALE LIVES: A PROPOSAL FOR INCORPORATING AGENCY VSL INTO TORT DAMAGES. The Notre Dame law review. 96(4). 1479.2 indexed citations
5.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2019). Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: The FDA's Dual Role as Safety and Health Information Regulator. The De Paul law review. 68(2). 11.3 indexed citations
6.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2017). Can Data Breach Claims Survive the Economic Loss Rule. The De Paul law review. 66(2). 3.2 indexed citations
7.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2017). The Anti-Deference Pro-Preemption Paradox at the U.S. Supreme Court: The Business Community Weighs In. Case Western Reserve law review. 67(3). 805.1 indexed citations
8.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2016). The Administrative State and the Common Law: Regulatory Substitutes or Complements?. Emory law journal. 65(6). 1705.1 indexed citations
9.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2015). The BP Oil Spill Settlements, Classwide Punitive Damages, and Societal Deterrence. The De Paul law review. 64(2). 19.1 indexed citations
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2013). The Future of Classwide Punitive Damages. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. 46(4). 1127–1150.1 indexed citations
12.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2013). Agency Coordination in Consumer Protection. The University of Chicago legal forum. 2013(1). 9.
13.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2012). Inside Agency Preemption. Michigan Law Review. 110(4). 521–521.1 indexed citations
14.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2009). Drug Advertising Claims: Preemption's New Frontier. Loyola of Los Angeles law review. 41(4). 1625.
15.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2009). Federalism Accountability: 'Agency-Forcing' Measures. Duke Law Journal. 58(8). 2125–2192.1 indexed citations
16.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2009). Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age. Tulsa law journal. 44(4). 677–706.2 indexed citations
17.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2008). CAFA Settlement Notice Provision: Optimal Regulatory Policy?. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 156(6). 1971.1 indexed citations
18.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2007). Federalism in Action: FDA Regulatory Preemption in Pharmaceutical Cases in State Versus Federal Courts. eYLS (Yale Law School). 15(3). 19.2 indexed citations
19.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2007). The Fraud Caveat to Agency Preemption. Northwestern University law review. 102(2). 841.1 indexed citations
20.
Sharkey, Catherine M.. (2003). Punitive Damages: Should Juries Decide?. Texas law review. 82(2). 381.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.