Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

396 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 396 indexed citations. Written by Oh Young Bang, Jeffrey L. Saver, Suk Jae Kim, Gyeong‐Moon Kim, Chin‐Sang Chung, Bruce Ovbiagele, Kwang Ho Lee and David S. Liebeskind covering the research area of Epidemiology, Surgery and Internal Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (365 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (254 citations) and Neurology (203 citations). Published in Stroke.

Countries where authors are citing Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.595256.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026