Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases
- Authors
- Neil R.M. BuistGeorge N. Donnell
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01800204 →Countries where authors are citing Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases
This map shows the geographic impact of Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases
This network shows the impact of Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases.
About Long‐term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases
This paper, published in 1989, received 396 indexed citations . Written by Neil R.M. Buist and George N. Donnell covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rheumatology and Clinical Biochemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Biochemistry (310 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (184 citations) and Biochemistry (114 citations). Published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01800204.