Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 268 indexed citations. Written by Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Yue Liu, Zhou Yang, Kailong Wang, Li Li, Xiapu Luo, David Lo, John Grundy and Haoyu Wang covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (127 citations), Artificial Intelligence (108 citations) and Software (69 citations). Published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1145/3695988 →

Countries where authors are citing Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1145/3695988.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026