International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

847 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 847 indexed citations. Written by Frank Lobbezoo, Jari Ahlberg, Karen G. Raphael, Peter Wetselaar, Alan G. Glaros, Takafumi Kato, Vivian Santiago, Ephraim Winocur, Antoon De Laat and Robert A. de Leeuw covering the research area of Speech and Hearing, Neurology and Complementary and Manual Therapy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Complementary and Manual Therapy (733 citations), Physiology (338 citations) and Orthodontics (259 citations). Published in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.

Countries where authors are citing International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress more than expected).

Fields of papers citing International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/joor.12663.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026