A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market
- Authors
- John F. Sherry
- Journal
- Journal of Consumer Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/208533 →Countries where authors are citing A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market
This map shows the geographic impact of A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market
This network shows the impact of A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market.
About A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market
This paper, published in 1990, received 477 indexed citations . Written by John F. Sherry covering the research area of Plant Science, Food Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (363 citations), Sociology and Political Science (180 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (109 citations). Published in Journal of Consumer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/208533.