Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 419 indexed citations. Written by Xiaolei Yin, Henner F. Farin, Johan H. van Es, Hans Clevers, Róbert Langer and Jeffrey M. Karp covering the research area of Oncology, Genetics and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (241 citations), Molecular Biology (183 citations) and Genetics (131 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2737.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026