The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch

520 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 520 indexed citations. Written by Meindert H. Lamers, Anastassis Perrakis, Jacqueline H. Enzlin, H.H.K. Winterwerp, Niels de Wind and Titia K. Sixma covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (454 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (265 citations) and Oncology (70 citations). Published in Nature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/35037523 →

Countries where authors are citing The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/35037523.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026