Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 821 indexed citations. Written by Xiao‐Ming Yin, Kun Wang, Atan Gross, Yongge Zhao, Sandra S. Zinkel, Barbara J. Klocke, Kevin A. Roth and Stanley J. Korsmeyer covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Infectious Diseases. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (686 citations), Epidemiology (210 citations) and Immunology (201 citations). Published in Nature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/23730 →

Countries where authors are citing Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/23730.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026