Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by Bruno C. Hancock and George Zografi covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Food Science and Pharmaceutical Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmaceutical Science (1.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (895 citations) and Spectroscopy (360 citations). Published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Countries where authors are citing Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/js9601896.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026