Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
- Journal
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jm050540c →Countries where authors are citing Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
This map shows the geographic impact of Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
This network shows the impact of Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects.
About Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Woody Sherman, Tyler Day, Matthew P. Jacobson, Richard A. Friesner and Ramy Farid covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (501 citations) and Organic Chemistry (293 citations). Published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jm050540c.