Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review
- Authors
- Howard M. MerkenGary R. Beecher
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jf990872o →Countries where authors are citing Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review
This network shows the impact of Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review.
About Measurement of Food Flavonoids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Review
This paper, published in 2000, received 500 indexed citations . Written by Howard M. Merken and Gary R. Beecher covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biochemistry (277 citations), Molecular Biology (147 citations) and Plant Science (140 citations). Published in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jf990872o.