Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties

961 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1997, received 961 indexed citations. Written by H. Guth covering the research area of Plant Science, Food Science and Sensory Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Food Science (915 citations), Plant Science (628 citations) and Biochemistry (366 citations). Published in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quantitation and Sensory Studies of Character Impact Odorants of Different White Wine Varieties.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jf970280a.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026