Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs
Countries where authors are citing Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs
This map shows the geographic impact of Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs
This network shows the impact of Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs.
About Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs
This paper, published in 1991, received 314 indexed citations . Written by Teresa Head‐Gordon, Martin Head‐Gordon, Michael J. Frisch, Charles L. Brooks and John A. Pople covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (249 citations), Spectroscopy (133 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (113 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00016a010.