Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions

708 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 708 indexed citations. Written by Giuseppe Riva, Fabrizia Mantovani, Alessandra Preziosa, Francesca Morganti, Daniela Villani, Andrea Gaggioli, Cristina Botella and Mariano Alcañíz covering the research area of Sensory Systems, Human-Computer Interaction and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Human-Computer Interaction (427 citations), Social Psychology (250 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (160 citations). Published in CyberPsychology & Behavior.

Countries where authors are citing Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9993.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026