Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins

454 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 454 indexed citations. Written by Steven L. Cohen and Brian T. Chait covering the research area of Computational Mechanics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (378 citations), Molecular Biology (228 citations) and Computational Mechanics (62 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Influence of Matrix Solution Conditions on the MALDI-MS Analysis of Peptides and Proteins.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac9507956.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026