Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac60139a005 →Countries where authors are citing Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System
This map shows the geographic impact of Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System
This network shows the impact of Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System.
About Chromatography of Amino Acids on Sulfonated Polystyrene Resins. An Improved System
This paper, published in 1958, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Stanford Moore, D. Spackman and William H. Stein covering the research area of Oncology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (872 citations), Plant Science (308 citations) and Cell Biology (239 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac60139a005.