Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5600878 →Countries where authors are citing Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
This map shows the geographic impact of Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
This network shows the impact of Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations.
About Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
This paper, published in 1978, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by David L. Otis, Kenneth P. Burnham, Gary C. White and David R. Anderson covering the research area of Genetics and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (1.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (557 citations) and Statistics and Probability (437 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5600878.