Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis
- Authors
- Edward V. ThomasDavid M. Haaland
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac00209a024 →Countries where authors are citing Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis
This network shows the impact of Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis.
About Comparison of multivariate calibration methods for quantitative spectral analysis
This paper, published in 1990, received 412 indexed citations . Written by Edward V. Thomas and David M. Haaland covering the research area of Food Science, Analytical Chemistry and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Analytical Chemistry (334 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (111 citations) and Spectroscopy (107 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac00209a024.