Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02990451 →Countries where authors are citing Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue
This map shows the geographic impact of Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue
This network shows the impact of Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue.
About Influence of ashing techniques on the analysis of trace elements in animal tissue
This paper, published in 1981, received 428 indexed citations . Written by Michael S. Clegg, Carl L. Keen, Bo Lönnerdal and Lucille S. Hurley covering the research area of Nutrition and Dietetics, Analytical Chemistry and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nutrition and Dietetics (331 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (120 citations) and Hematology (95 citations). Published in Biological Trace Element Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02990451.