Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions
- Journal
- Economic Botany
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02863092 →Countries where authors are citing Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions
This map shows the geographic impact of Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions
This network shows the impact of Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions.
About Traditional medicine in Turkey VII. Folk medicine in middle and west Black Sea regions
This paper, published in 1995, received 191 indexed citations . Written by Tetsuro Fujita, Ekrem Sezik, Mamoru Tabata, Erdem Yeşilada, Gisho Honda, Yoshio Takeda, Toshihiro Tanaka and Yoshihisa Takaishi covering the research area of Museology, Language and Linguistics and History. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (126 citations), Molecular Biology (76 citations) and Food Science (74 citations). Published in Economic Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02863092.