The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology
- Authors
- A. R. Lurii︠a︡
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01914341 →Countries where authors are citing The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology
This map shows the geographic impact of The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology
This network shows the impact of The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology.
About The working brain : an introduction to neuropsychology
This paper, published in 1973, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by A. R. Lurii︠a︡. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (522 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (314 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01914341.