Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations

418 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1978, received 418 indexed citations. Written by Curtis C. Travis and Glenn F. Webb covering the research area of Numerical Analysis, Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Mathematics (370 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (250 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (150 citations). Published in Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae.

Countries where authors are citing Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01902205.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026