Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes
- Authors
- John Biggs
- Journal
- Higher Education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01680526 →Countries where authors are citing Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes
This map shows the geographic impact of Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes
This network shows the impact of Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes.
About Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes
This paper, published in 1979, received 573 indexed citations . Written by John Biggs covering the research area of Management of Technology and Innovation and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (461 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (186 citations) and Social Psychology (64 citations). Published in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01680526.