Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 600 indexed citations. Written by Robert J. Bies and Debra L. Shapiro covering the research area of General Decision Sciences and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (371 citations), Sociology and Political Science (253 citations) and Social Psychology (105 citations). Published in Social Justice Research.

Countries where authors are citing Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01048016.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026