Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 925 indexed citations. Written by Manuel Barrera and Irwin N. Sandler covering the research area of General Health Professions and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (380 citations), Social Psychology (286 citations) and General Health Professions (279 citations). Published in American Journal of Community Psychology.

Countries where authors are citing Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00918174.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026