Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl801386m →Countries where authors are citing Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes
This map shows the geographic impact of Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes
This network shows the impact of Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes.
About Direct Imaging of Lattice Atoms and Topological Defects in Graphene Membranes
This paper, published in 2008, received 930 indexed citations . Written by Jannik C. Meyer, C. Kisielowski, Rolf Erni, Marta D. Rossell, Michael F. Crommie and Alex Zettl covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (817 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (345 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (159 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl801386m.