Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation
- Authors
- Michio Jimbo
- Journal
- Letters in Mathematical Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00704588 →Countries where authors are citing Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation
This map shows the geographic impact of Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation
This network shows the impact of Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation.
About Aq-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation
This paper, published in 1985, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Michio Jimbo covering the research area of Algebra and Number Theory, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Geometry and Topology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geometry and Topology (1.4k citations), Algebra and Number Theory (948 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (867 citations). Published in Letters in Mathematical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00704588.