Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics
- Journal
- Journal of Business Ethics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00383391 →Countries where authors are citing Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics
This map shows the geographic impact of Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics
This network shows the impact of Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics.
About Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics
This paper, published in 1990, received 571 indexed citations . Written by R. Eric Reidenbach and Donald P. Robin covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems and Management (424 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (259 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (119 citations). Published in Journal of Business Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00383391.