Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students

823 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 823 indexed citations. Written by Shari L. Britner and Frank Pajares covering the research area of Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (479 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (304 citations) and Social Psychology (240 citations). Published in Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Countries where authors are citing Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026