Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9357 →Countries where authors are citing Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives
This map shows the geographic impact of Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives
This network shows the impact of Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives.
About Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives
This paper, published in 2018, received 345 indexed citations . Written by Pascal Degraeve, Hicham Ferhout, Jalloul Bouajila and Nadia Oulahal covering the research area of Biochemistry, Food Science and Complementary and alternative medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Food Science (195 citations), Biochemistry (121 citations) and Plant Science (87 citations). Published in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9357.