Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens

176 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2022, received 176 indexed citations. Written by Annamma Joy, Ying Zhu and Camilo Peña covering the research area of Museology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Marketing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (81 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (77 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (46 citations). Published in Strategic Change.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2502 →

Countries where authors are citing Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2502.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026