A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles

503 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 503 indexed citations. Written by Helena Cabral-Marques covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Food Science and Pharmaceutical Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Food Science (223 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (166 citations) and Biomaterials (106 citations). Published in Flavour and Fragrance Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/ffj.2019 →

Countries where authors are citing A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ffj.2019.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026