Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies

420 indexed citations

Abstract

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 420 indexed citations. Written by Graham Fairfoul, Lynne I. McGuire, Suvankar Pal, James W. Ironside, Sharon Christie, Catherine Joachim, Margaret M. Esiri, Samuel Evetts, Michal Rolinski and Fahd Baig covering the research area of Neurology and Physiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Neurology (331 citations), Physiology (171 citations) and Neurology (100 citations). Published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/acn3.338 →

Countries where authors are citing Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies

Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies

Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/acn3.338.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact