Zin‐Juan Klaft
About
In The Last Decade
Zin‐Juan Klaft
10 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 212
- Molecular Biology 102
- Psychiatry and Mental health 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 79
- Physiology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Zin‐Juan Klaft
This map shows the geographic impact of Zin‐Juan Klaft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zin‐Juan Klaft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zin‐Juan Klaft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zin‐Juan Klaft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zin‐Juan Klaft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zin‐Juan Klaft. The network helps show where Zin‐Juan Klaft may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zin‐Juan Klaft
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zin‐Juan Klaft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zin‐Juan Klaft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zin‐Juan Klaft. Zin‐Juan Klaft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 62 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 36 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.