Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management
Citations per year, relative to Žiga Turk Žiga Turk (= 1×)
peers
İbrahim Yitmen
Countries citing papers authored by Žiga Turk
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Žiga Turk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Žiga Turk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Žiga Turk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Žiga Turk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Žiga Turk. The network helps show where Žiga Turk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Žiga Turk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Žiga Turk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Žiga Turk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Žiga Turk. Žiga Turk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Klinc, Robert, Žiga Turk, & Matevž Dolenc. (2009). Engineering collaboration 2.0: requirements and expectations. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 14(31). 473–488.18 indexed citations
11.
Turk, Žiga, et al.. (2008). Interoperability in practice: geometric data exchance using the IFC standard. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 13(24). 362–380.58 indexed citations
12.
Dolenc, Matevž, et al.. (2007). The InteliGrid platform for virtual organisations interoperability. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 12(30). 459–477.16 indexed citations
13.
Turk, Žiga, et al.. (2007). Evaluation of IFC Optimization.2 indexed citations
14.
Björk, Bo‐Christer & Žiga Turk. (2006). The Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon): An Open Access Journal Using an Un-Paid, Volunteer-Based Organization.. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja. 11(3). 9.5 indexed citations
15.
Björk, Bo‐Christer, et al.. (2005). THE SCHOLARLY JOURNAL RE-ENGINEERED: A CASE STUDY OF AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL IN CONSTRUCTION IT. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 10(23). 349–371.10 indexed citations
16.
Turk, Žiga, Vlado Stankovski, Matevž Dolenc, & Tomo Cerovšek. (2004). Semantic Extensions for the Virtual Enterprise's Grid Infastructure.. Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications. 788–793.1 indexed citations
17.
Turk, Žiga. (2003). WODA - A Web Services Generator.. International Conference on Internet Computing. 661–664.
18.
Björk, Bo‐Christer & Žiga Turk. (2000). A Survey on the Impact of the Internet on Scientific Publishing in Construction IT and Construction Management. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 5(5). 73–88.8 indexed citations
19.
Fischinger, Matej, Tomo Cerovšek, & Žiga Turk. (1998). EASY: A hypermedia learning tool. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 3(1). 1–10.1 indexed citations
20.
Turk, Žiga, et al.. (1998). Towards a Generic Process Model for AEC. Computing in Civil Engineering. 518–521.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.