Zena Lim

492 citations
11 papers · 304 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 5
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 4
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 4

Zena Lim

11 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Zena Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Ophthalmology 289
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 154
  • Neurology 21
  • Neurology 33
  • Epidemiology 39
Replace Martin Šín with:
Martin Šín Czechia
Ana Quartilho United Kingdom
Shino Sato Japan
Leopoldo Magacho Brazil
Şerife Bayraktar Türkiye
Denise Descovich Canada
J. Sée Singapore
Lina Huang China
Itika Garg United States
Craig Wilde United Kingdom
Zena Lim relative to Martin Šín Czechia Martin Šín's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Martin Šín · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zena Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zena Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zena Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zena Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zena Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zena Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zena Lim. The network helps show where Zena Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Zena Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zena Lim Line = papers co-authored together Zena Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2010200
2 201036
3 201124
4 201218
5 20088
6 20116
7 20144
8 20103
9 20112
10
[The long-term effect of phacoemulsification combined with trabeculectomy and intraoperative 5-fluorouracil in glaucoma patients].
20052
11
Characteristics of Divergence Excess Type Intermittent Exotropia in Asian Children
20081

About Zena Lim

Zena Lim is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Connexins and lens biology (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (289 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (154 citations), Neurology (21 citations), Neurology (33 citations) and Epidemiology (39 citations). Zena Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include Maria Cecilia Aquino, Paul Chew, J. Sée, Anna Marie Tan, Yiong Huak Chan, Alex V. Levin, Kelly W. Muir, Lois Duncan, Sharon F. Freedman and Henrietta Ho. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact