Zai-Wei Ge

6.7k citations
41 papers · 550 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 38
    • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 2
    • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 29

Zai-Wei Ge

38 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

Zai-Wei Ge
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Cell Biology 314
  • Plant Science 483
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 210
  • Pharmacology 152
  • Insect Science 79
Replace Brian P. Looney with:
Brian P. Looney United States
Nourou S. Yorou Benin
Marisol Sánchez‐García Sweden
Felipe Wartchow Brazil
Genevieve Gates Australia
Beatrice Belfiori Italy
Marco Contu Italy
Maria Alice Neves Brazil
Heidi Tamm Estonia
Jesús Dı́ez Spain
Zai-Wei Ge relative to Brian P. Looney United States Brian P. Looney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Brian P. Looney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zai-Wei Ge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zai-Wei Ge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zai-Wei Ge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zai-Wei Ge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zai-Wei Ge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zai-Wei Ge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zai-Wei Ge. The network helps show where Zai-Wei Ge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zai-Wei Ge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zai-Wei Ge Line = papers co-authored together Zai-Wei Ge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 201250
3 201043
4 202232
5 201630
6 201527
7 201025
8 201422
9 202222
10 201821
11 201218
12 201818
13 202115
14 200513
15 201112
16 202012
17 201711
18
Flammulina species from China inferred by morphological and molecular data
200811
19 201011
20 202011

About Zai-Wei Ge

Zai-Wei Ge is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (38 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (29 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (12 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (12 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (11 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (5 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (314 citations), Plant Science (483 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (210 citations), Pharmacology (152 citations) and Insect Science (79 citations). Zai-Wei Ge has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Matthew E. Smith, Zhu L. Yang, Else C. Vellinga, Zhu L. Yang, Gregory Bonito, T. B. Brenneman, Takamichi Orihara, Nitaro Maekawa, Donald H. Pfister and Zhu‐Liang Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotaxa, MycoKeys, Mycologia, Journal of Fungi and Fungal Diversity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact