Yves Le Tulzo
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Immunology top 2%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Arnaud GacouinChristophe CamusPierre TattevinSylvain LavouéR. ThomasOlivier TributJean‐Marc TadiéCéline Pangault
- Topics
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (14 papers)Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineApplied Microbiology and BiotechnologyEpidemiology
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Yves Le Tulzo
96 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Epidemiology 1.7k
- Immunology 940
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 636
- Surgery 621
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 578
Countries citing papers authored by Yves Le Tulzo
This map shows the geographic impact of Yves Le Tulzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yves Le Tulzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yves Le Tulzo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Yves Le Tulzo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yves Le Tulzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yves Le Tulzo. The network helps show where Yves Le Tulzo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yves Le Tulzo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yves Le Tulzo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yves Le Tulzo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yves Le Tulzo. Yves Le Tulzo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 166 | |
| 7 | 158 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 126 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 177 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Yves Le Tulzo
Yves Le Tulzo is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Epidemiology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (14 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (636 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (102 citations) and Epidemiology (1.7k citations). Yves Le Tulzo has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Arnaud Gacouin, Christophe Camus, Pierre Tattevin, Sylvain Lavoué, R. Thomas, Olivier Tribut, Jean‐Marc Tadié, Céline Pangault, Fabrice Uhel and Edward Abraham. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.