Yves Lacasse
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Physiology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Surgery
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Roger GoldsteinSylvie MartinToby J LassersonJocelyn GrégoireMichel PirauxLouis F. JacquesJean DeslauriersGuojin Liu
- Topics
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (5 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers)Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Issues, ethics and legal aspectsPulmonary and Respiratory MedicineComplementary and alternative medicine
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Yves Lacasse
9 papers receiving 871 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 763
- Physiology 144
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 111
- Surgery 111
- Complementary and alternative medicine 106
Countries citing papers authored by Yves Lacasse
This map shows the geographic impact of Yves Lacasse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yves Lacasse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yves Lacasse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Yves Lacasse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yves Lacasse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yves Lacasse. The network helps show where Yves Lacasse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yves Lacasse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yves Lacasse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yves Lacasse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yves Lacasse. Yves Lacasse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 60 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasebreakdown → | 448 |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 201 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 31 |
About Yves Lacasse
Yves Lacasse is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pharmacy and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (5 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (43 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (763 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (106 citations). Yves Lacasse has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Roger Goldstein, Sylvie Martin, Toby J Lasserson, Jocelyn Grégoire, Michel Piraux, Louis F. Jacques, Jean Deslauriers, Guojin Liu, François Maltais and Isabelle Vivodtzev. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CHEST Journal and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.