Yuka Fujii
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Spectroscopy
- Co-authors
- Hajime KawaharaD. S. AmundsenAnthony D. Del GenioEdwin L. TurnerYasushi SutoTeruyuki NakajimaNancy Y. KiangVictoria Meadows
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers)Astro and Planetary Science (14 papers)Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesThe Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Yuka Fujii
30 papers receiving 524 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 494
- Atmospheric Science 185
- Instrumentation 92
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 41
- Spectroscopy 37
Countries citing papers authored by Yuka Fujii
This map shows the geographic impact of Yuka Fujii's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yuka Fujii with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yuka Fujii more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Yuka Fujii
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yuka Fujii. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yuka Fujii. The network helps show where Yuka Fujii may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yuka Fujii
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yuka Fujii. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yuka Fujii based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yuka Fujii. Yuka Fujii is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | [Mineralization pattern of human cementum]. | 3 |
About Yuka Fujii
Yuka Fujii is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Anatomy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (14 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (494 citations), Instrumentation (92 citations) and Atmospheric Science (185 citations). Yuka Fujii has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hajime Kawahara, D. S. Amundsen, Anthony D. Del Genio, Edwin L. Turner, Yasushi Suto, Teruyuki Nakajima, Nancy Y. Kiang, Victoria Meadows, Edward W. Schwieterman and Mark A. Chandler. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.