Naoshi Baba

101 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

Naoshi Baba
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Instrumentation 63
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 243
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 439
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 10
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 184
Replace D. Scott Acton with:
D. Scott Acton United States
David G. Sandler United States
Laird A. Thompson United States
Richard G. Lyon United States
Enrico Marchetti Germany
Lisa Poyneer United States
Vincent Michau France
C. G. Wynne United Kingdom
Erkin Sidick United States
Luc Gilles United States
Naoshi Baba relative to D. Scott Acton United States D. Scott Acton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
D. Scott Acton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Naoshi Baba

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naoshi Baba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naoshi Baba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naoshi Baba more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naoshi Baba

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naoshi Baba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naoshi Baba. The network helps show where Naoshi Baba may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Naoshi Baba, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Naoshi Baba Line = papers co-authored together Naoshi Baba links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Iterative blind deconvolution method using Lucy's algorithm
199441
2 201029
3 200827
4 200326
5 201325
6 200224
7 200323
8 200122
9 200221
10 198519
11 199416
12 200515
13 199215
14 201014
15 200112
16 200911
17 201411
18 200810
19 199310
20 19939

About Naoshi Baba

Naoshi Baba is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 111 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (73 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (39 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (31 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (22 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (18 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (11 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and solar cell performance optimization (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (63 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (243 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (439 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (10 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (184 citations). Naoshi Baba has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Serbia and France. Frequent co-authors include Noriaki Miura, Naoshi Murakami, Motohide Tamura, Jun Nishikawa, Nobuyuki Hashimoto, Kazuhiko Oka, S. Ueno, Hiroyuki Tomita, Kiyoshi Ichimoto and Zhan Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Communications, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, The Astrophysical Journal and The Astronomical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact