Yanli You
About
In The Last Decade
Yanli You
4 papers receiving 890 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Clinical Psychology 758
- General Health Professions 379
- Economics and Econometrics 183
- Oncology 122
- Emergency Medical Services 122
Countries citing papers authored by Yanli You
This map shows the geographic impact of Yanli You's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yanli You with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yanli You more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Yanli You
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yanli You. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yanli You. The network helps show where Yanli You may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yanli You
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yanli You. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yanli You based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yanli You. Yanli You is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID-19 patients breakdown → | 913 |
| 4 | 8 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.