Yang Cong

508 citations
26 papers · 373 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Yang Cong

21 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Yang Cong
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 40
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 133
  • Cancer Research 59
  • Hematology 39
  • Genetics 33
Replace Louise J. Eltringham‐Smith with:
Louise J. Eltringham‐Smith Canada
Stefan Bartsch Germany
Ali Noroozi‐Aghideh Iran
Felix Zhou United States
Ding‐Chao Rong China
Arong Gaowa Japan
Linqi Ouyang China
Mark van Geffen Netherlands
Yang Cong relative to Louise J. Eltringham‐Smith Canada Louise J. Eltringham‐Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Louise J. Eltringham‐Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yang Cong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yang Cong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yang Cong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yang Cong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yang Cong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yang Cong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yang Cong. The network helps show where Yang Cong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yang Cong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yang Cong Line = papers co-authored together Yang Cong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202199
2 200864
3 202150
4 202326
5 201824
6 202120
7 202116
8 20219
9 20238
10 20208
11 20218
12 20227
13 20237
14 20196
15 20215
16 20254
17 20114
18 20113
19 20232
20 20092

About Yang Cong

Yang Cong is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Oncology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (6 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (5 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (40 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (133 citations), Cancer Research (59 citations), Hematology (39 citations) and Genetics (33 citations). Yang Cong has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronggui Hu, Yang Zhao, Zu‐Yin Yu, Sai Wang, Zijun Song, Li Jiang, Kai Wang, Hao Wang, Qian Wu and Junxia Min. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pulmonary Medicine, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Frontiers in Oncology, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and HIV Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact