Yana Richens

669 total citations
42 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Yana Richens is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Yana Richens has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in Surgery and 9 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Yana Richens's work include Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (6 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers). Yana Richens is often cited by papers focused on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (6 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers). Yana Richens collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Yana Richens's co-authors include Tina Lavender, Debbie Smith, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Therese Dowswell, Rebecca MD Smyth, Stephen J Milan, Rosalind Raine, Martin Cartwright, SM Creighton and Gillian ML Gyte and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

In The Last Decade

Yana Richens

36 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Yana Richens United Kingdom	12	252	195	123	121	93	42	468
Christine Kurtz Landy Canada	12	266 1.1×	182 0.9×	143 1.2×	136 1.1×	220 2.4×	18	547
Wendy E. Peterson Canada	15	148 0.6×	139 0.7×	163 1.3×	217 1.8×	57 0.6×	34	555
Melissa Nothnagle United States	15	466 1.8×	187 1.0×	122 1.0×	217 1.8×	62 0.7×	43	735
Margaret Barnes Australia	14	157 0.6×	132 0.7×	100 0.8×	187 1.5×	78 0.8×	45	581
Bobbie Sue Sterling United States	16	470 1.9×	334 1.7×	108 0.9×	149 1.2×	158 1.7×	24	719
Vidanka Vasilevski Australia	12	176 0.7×	322 1.7×	130 1.1×	102 0.8×	153 1.6×	63	557
Petra Goodman United States	8	263 1.0×	414 2.1×	255 2.1×	144 1.2×	134 1.4×	17	587
Ellen B. Buckner United States	13	239 0.9×	62 0.3×	155 1.3×	243 2.0×	133 1.4×	50	622
Trudy Klomp Netherlands	14	182 0.7×	312 1.6×	226 1.8×	126 1.0×	57 0.6×	22	536
Dotti C. James United States	10	166 0.7×	239 1.2×	214 1.7×	69 0.6×	76 0.8×	14	530

Countries citing papers authored by Yana Richens

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yana Richens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yana Richens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yana Richens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yana Richens

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yana Richens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yana Richens. The network helps show where Yana Richens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yana Richens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yana Richens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yana Richens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yana Richens. Yana Richens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hundley, Vanora, et al.. (2023). The perfect birth: a content analysis of midwives’ posts about birth on Instagram. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 23(1). 422–422. 3 indexed citations

Wood, R. J., Yana Richens, & Tina Lavender. (2021). The experiences and psychological outcomes for pregnant women who have had FGM: A systematic review. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 29. 100639–100639. 6 indexed citations

Silverio, Sergio A., Susan Bewley, Elsa Montgomery, et al.. (2020). Disclosure of non-recent (historic) childhood sexual abuse: What should researchers do?. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47(12). 779–783. 6 indexed citations

Richens, Yana, et al.. (2020). Guidance for the provision of antenatal services during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Midwifery. 28(5). 324–327. 6 indexed citations

Richens, Yana, Malcolm Campbell, & Tina Lavender. (2019). Fear of birth–A prospective cohort study of primigravida in the UK. Midwifery. 77. 101–109. 13 indexed citations

Richens, Yana, Debbie Smith, & Tina Lavender. (2018). Fear of birth in clinical practice: A structured review of current measurement tools. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 16. 98–112. 63 indexed citations

Richens, Yana, Debbie Smith, & Tina Lavender. (2018). Corrigendum to “Fear of birth in clinical practice: A structured review of current measurement tools” [Sex. Reprod. Healthcare 16 (2018) 98–112]. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 21. 108–108. 2 indexed citations

Richens, Yana, et al.. (2016). Female genital mutilation: an ‘old’ problem with no place in a modern world. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 95(10). 1193–1195. 1 indexed citations

Richens, Yana, et al.. (2015). A national online survey of UK maternity unit service provision for women with fear of birth. British Journal of Midwifery. 23(8). 574–579. 20 indexed citations

10.

Manning, Sean, Nick Finer, Mohamed Elkalaawy, et al.. (2014). Timing of pregnancy in obese women after bariatric surgery. Pregnancy Hypertension. 4(3). 235–235. 3 indexed citations

11.

Liao, Lih‐Mei, et al.. (2013). Quality of obstetric and midwifery care for pregnant women who have undergone female genital mutilation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 33(5). 459–462. 23 indexed citations

12.

Richens, Yana & Debbie Smith. (2011). Applied qualitative research in maternity care: a reflection of the barriers to data collection with ?at-risk? populations.. Diversity & Equality in Health and Care. 8(1). 29–36. 1 indexed citations

13.

Bedwell, Carol, Gillian Houghton, Yana Richens, & Tina Lavender. (2010). ‘She can choose, as long as I’m happy with it’: A qualitative study of expectant fathers’ views of birth place. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2(2). 71–75. 17 indexed citations

14.

Raine, Rosalind, et al.. (2009). A Qualitative Study of Women’s Experiences of Communication in Antenatal Care: Identifying Areas for Action. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 14(4). 590–599. 57 indexed citations

15.

Richens, Yana. (2008). Bring back the scales. British Journal of Midwifery. 16(8). 534–535. 3 indexed citations

16.

Taylor, Clare, Yana Richens, & Rachel Burbeck. (2007). Mental health and childbirth.. PubMed. 10(4). 176–7. 1 indexed citations

17.

Richens, Yana. (2005). Clinical guidance in diabetes: using the internet. Nursing Standard. 19(28). 41–42. 1 indexed citations

18.

Richens, Yana. (2004). Non-English speaking women are at risk. British Journal of Midwifery. 12(2). 68–70. 1 indexed citations

19.

Richens, Yana, et al.. (2004). Getting guidelines into practice: a literature review. Nursing Standard. 18(50). 33–40. 34 indexed citations

20.

Richens, Yana. (2002). Are midwives using research evidence in practice?. British Journal of Midwifery. 10(1). 11–16. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact