Countries where authors publish in Stem Cell Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cell Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cell Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cell Reports more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cell Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cell Reports.
About Stem Cell Reports
The 2.5k papers published in Stem Cell Reports in the last decades have received a total of 100.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Stem Cell Reports usually cover Developmental Neuroscience (191 papers), Molecular Biology (1.1k papers), Hematology (152 papers), Genetics (70 papers) and Physiology (109 papers) specifically the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (746 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (190 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (135 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (72 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (49 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (46 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (44 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cell Reports are Eduardo Marbán, Ke Cheng, Ahmed Ibrahim, Christine L. Mummery, Masayo Takahashi, Hideyuki Okano, Michiko Mandai, Austin G Smith, William James and Jun B. Takahashi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.