Stem Cell Reports

2.2k papers and 77.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Stem Cell Reports in the last decades have received a total of 77.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Stem Cell Reports usually cover Molecular Biology (1.6k papers), Surgery (281 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (267 papers) specifically the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (823 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (425 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (236 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cell Reports are Eduardo Marbán, Ahmed Ibrahim, Ke Cheng, Christine L. Mummery, Masayo Takahashi, Hideyuki Okano, Michiko Mandai, Austin Smith, Satoshi Okamoto and William James.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Stem Cell Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cell Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cell Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Stem Cell Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cell Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cell Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cell Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025