Xueming Dong

33 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Xueming Dong
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Fuel Technology 20
  • Analytical Chemistry 115
  • Molecular Medicine 39
  • Ceramics and Composites 43
  • Mechanics of Materials 151
Replace Jonathan Moffat with:
Jonathan Moffat United Kingdom
Helena Lennholm Sweden
Vitaly Erukhimovitch Israel
Lili Mao China
Xiaohong Tan United States
Leandro S. Herculano Brazil
Takuji Harada Japan
Zdeněk Pilát Czechia
Johannes Franz Germany
Xueming Dong relative to Jonathan Moffat United Kingdom Jonathan Moffat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Jonathan Moffat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xueming Dong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xueming Dong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xueming Dong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xueming Dong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xueming Dong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xueming Dong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xueming Dong. The network helps show where Xueming Dong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xueming Dong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xueming Dong Line = papers co-authored together Xueming Dong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199198
2 201063
3 201355
4 201840
5 202235
6 201826
7 202124
8 201924
9 201224
10 201822
11 202021
12 201421
13 201520
14 202016
15 201813
16 201512
17 201812
18 199711
19 201810
20 20228

About Xueming Dong

Xueming Dong is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy, Mechanics of Materials and Molecular Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Petroleum Processing and Analysis (10 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (9 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (8 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (3 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers) and Heat transfer and supercritical fluids (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fuel Technology (20 citations), Analytical Chemistry (115 citations), Molecular Medicine (39 citations), Ceramics and Composites (43 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (151 citations). Xueming Dong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Said Jahanmir, Stephen M. Hsu, Xing Fan, Xian‐Yong Wei, Hilkka I. Kenttämaa, Kai Tang, Zhao‐Xun Liang, Yaning Qi, Yun‐Peng Zhao and Bengang Xing. Their work appears in journals such as Fuel, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Smart Materials and Structures, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact